<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>washoevalley.org &#187; Civics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washoevalley.org/archives/category/civics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washoevalley.org</link>
	<description>Neighbors Talking With Neighbors in Washoe Valley, Nevada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:50:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Help Washoe Valley</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/478</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/478#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WVWG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a member of the Washoe Valley Working Group:
&#8220;As it says in the flyer,  the East Washoe Valley working group &#38; the West Washoe Homeowners Association have hired a private attorney, Tom Hall, to represent Washoe Valley citizens&#8217; interests in  two lawsuits regarding the TMSA application for municipal sewer and water that could, &#38; probably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a member of the Washoe Valley Working Group:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;As it says in the flyer,  the East Washoe Valley working group &amp; the West Washoe Homeowners Association have hired a private attorney, Tom Hall, to represent Washoe Valley citizens&#8217; interests in  two lawsuits regarding the TMSA application for municipal sewer and water that could, &amp; probably would, lead to high density development in Washoe Valley.  Tom is well versed in water and land issues.  One lawsuit concerns the Weston property, 1 full section above Little Washoe Lake behind the power lines at the top of the hill going east.  The rest is explained in the flyer.  If you donate it would be wise to put &#8220;for the WV legal defense fund&#8221; at the bottom so you can deduct it on your taxes and would be used only for that fund.  Thank you!&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-479" title="community-fund-flyer" src="http://washoevalley.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/community-fund-flyer.jpg" alt="community-fund-flyer" width="490" height="517" /><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/478/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washoe Valley Fire Dept Gets Stimulus Money</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/471</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/471#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["sierra fire protection district"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sfpd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west washoe valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sierra Fire Protection District has just learned that it will receive $2 million dollars of federal stimulus money for a new fire station in the Arrowcreek neighborhood of southwest Reno according to this article in the Sacramento Bee. The SFPD serves a 214 square mile area of the eastern Sierra (Carson Range) which includes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sierra Fire Protection District has just learned that it will receive $2 million dollars of federal stimulus money for a new fire station in the Arrowcreek neighborhood of southwest Reno according to this <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/state_wire/story/2211585.html">article in the Sacramento Bee</a>. The SFPD serves a 214 square mile area of the eastern Sierra (Carson Range) which includes West Washoe Valley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/471/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Valleys Area Plan Update</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/469</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/469#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SVAP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The South Valleys Area Plan was approved by the
Regional Planning Governing Board
on May 14, 2009
Highlights:
•    Strong vision and mission statements to maintain the rural character
of Washoe Valley
•    One house per five acres for East Washoe Valley including
Ophir Lake Properties (no specific plan for Mr. Weston)
•    One house per ten acres for West Washoe Valley with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>The South Valleys Area Plan was approved by the</strong><br />
<strong>Regional Planning Governing Board</strong><br />
<strong>on May 14, 2009</strong></p>
<p>Highlights:<br />
•    Strong vision and mission statements to maintain the rural character<br />
of Washoe Valley<br />
•    One house per five acres for East Washoe Valley including<br />
Ophir Lake Properties (no specific plan for Mr. Weston)<br />
•    One house per ten acres for West Washoe Valley with encouragement for ongoing agricultural land use<br />
•    Defined commercial area boundaries with limited expansion<br />
•    Compatible Allowed Uses for the commercial area<br />
•    Language that shows the support Washoe County and the<br />
Regional Planning Commission for a scenic byway<br />
A fourteen mile Washoe Valley State Scenic Byway has been approved by the Nevada Department of Transportation.<br />
Please check washoevalley.org for updates.<br />
Goal not met:       The South Valleys Area Plan does not keep the TMSA out of Washoe Valley. Mr. Weston has a TMSA request for public water and sewer for his entire 640 acres.  Negotiations are in progress to limit his TMSA access to the north of the hydrographic basin line (currently being surveyed) on the property.  The TMSA request will be heard before the end of this year.<br />
Please check washoevalley.org for updates.<br />
Appreciation:<br />
Thank you to Commissioner David Humke; Washoe County Community Development; East and West Washoe Valley CAB members; the Washoe Valley Working Group members; and to the dedication and spirit of the entire Washoe Valley community.<br />
Special thanks to washoevalley.org for keeping us informed.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/469/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incline Lake Drained &#8211; Editorial</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/450</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/450#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incline lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We drove by Incline Lake the other day and noticed it was drained. It has since been mentioned in the media. Recently, the feds spent $46 million for a property with the major feature, and presumably the majority of the value, of an alpine lake. Now, after paying a premium for a lake, the feds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We drove by Incline Lake the other day and noticed it was drained. It has since been mentioned in the <a href="http://www.kolotv.com/news/headlines/50134422.html">media</a>. Recently, the<img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-453" title="incline-lake" src="http://washoevalley.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/incline-lake-300x218.jpg" alt="incline-lake" width="300" height="218" /> feds spent $46 million for a property with the major feature, and presumably the majority of the value, of an alpine lake. Now, after paying a premium for a lake, the feds say their is a danger of the 1946 dam failing. Huh? Couldn&#8217;t this be determined before we bought the lake?</p>
<p>Maybe we could have gotten a deal by saving the owner of the liability.</p>
<p>Anyway, we need to figure out a way to save our investment. Right here above Washoe Valley we have an answer, I think. Recently a homeowner in the northwest side of the valley allegedly modified Joy Lake, another old reservoir, without approved engineering or permits according to news reports. After the work was completed, the state engineer awarded him with a letter saying essentially that all standards had been met and the lake would &#8220;be safe for years to come&#8221;.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s send this dam genius up to Incline Lake, let him work his magic on his homeowner&#8217;s budget and get a similar stamp of approval from the Nevada State Engineer.</p>
<p>One party sold us a lake that doesn&#8217;t exist and another took it upon himself to make a lake bigger and safe. We need to convince these dam people who know how to work the system to work for us too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/450/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SVAP Passed By County</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/431</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/431#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SVAP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to emails we&#8217;ve received, the South Valley&#8217;s Area Plan was passed by the County Commissioners at their last meeting on April 8th. Don&#8217;t know the particulars but we hear the Washoe Valley Working Group folks put on a great presentation. Word is that the Regional Planning Board will consider it again in May.
If anyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to emails we&#8217;ve received, the South Valley&#8217;s Area Plan was passed by the County Commissioners at their last meeting on April 8th. Don&#8217;t know the particulars but we hear the Washoe Valley Working Group folks put on a great presentation. Word is that the Regional Planning Board will consider it again in May.</p>
<p>If anyone involved would like to send in some info on the status of the SVAP, we&#8217;d be glad to share it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/431/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paving Project in Washoe Valley</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/427</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/427#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This News 4 article is mostly about driving safely in NDOT construction zones but mentions that &#8220;US 395 from Pagni Lane to Bowers Mansion Road: Resurface roadway beginning in July and completed in November.&#8221; Pagni Road is in the south end of Pleasant Valley and Bowers Mansion Road is, umm, right over, uh, dunno. Do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.krnv.com/global/story.asp?s=10146822">News 4 article</a> is mostly about driving safely in NDOT construction zones but mentions that &#8220;<span><span style="color: #000000; font-size: x-small;">US 395 from Pagni Lane to Bowers Mansion Road: Resurface roadway beginning in July and completed in November.&#8221; Pagni Road is in the south end of Pleasant Valley and Bowers Mansion Road is, umm, right over, uh, dunno. Do they mean the driveway to Bowers Mansion or Old 395 where it leaves 395? I can&#8217;t find an actual &#8220;Bower&#8217;s Mansion Road&#8221;.<br />
</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/427/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suggest Ways To Spend Money</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/418</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/418#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communtiy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washoe County asks for your cooperation in the following matter:
(see posts above for suggestions from residents)

&#8220;Additional State CDBG Grant Opportunity&#8211;
With the addition of stimulus funding there will be an additional funding round for the state CDBG program this spring. There is approximately $1,000,000 in funds available for this second round of grant funds.  Due to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Washoe County asks for your cooperation in the following matter:</em></p>
<p><em>(see posts above for suggestions from residents)<br />
</em></p>
<p>&#8220;Additional State CDBG Grant Opportunity&#8211;</p>
<p>With the addition of stimulus funding there will be an additional funding round for the state CDBG program this spring. There is approximately $1,000,000 in funds available for this second round of grant funds.  Due to the timing requirement of these funds, the grant process is accelerated.  The deadline for submission of the preliminary application is April 17, 2009.  Please let me know as soon as possible if you have a project you are considering submitting.</p>
<p>Only unincorporated areas of Washoe County are eligible to submit to the State CDBG program.  In addition the primary goal of the CDBG program is to serve low to moderate income residents.  The areas eligible for area wide projects are primarily Sun Valley and Gerlach due to the income requirements.  In addition, projects that serve a limited clientele in other areas of unincorporated Washoe County may also be eligible.</p>
<p>Examples of Eligible Projects:</p>
<p>Water, wastewater and storm drain design and construction<br />
Streets, roads, and sidewalks<br />
Fire Stations<br />
Community, senior and youth centers<br />
Emergency vehicles/equipment<br />
Planning<br />
Downtown revitalization<br />
Libraries<br />
Landfills<br />
Assisted living facilities<br />
Substance Abuse Centers<br />
Handicapped Access<br />
Services programs</p>
<p>I will be conducting in information meeting on April 2, at 2:00 PM in the Washoe County Caucus Room at which the CDBG program, past CDBG projects, and program requirements will be reviewed.   I encourage you to call me at 328-2009 and discuss any project you are considering for submission.</p>
<p>Thank you for your assistance!</p>
<p>Gabrielle</p>
<p>Gabrielle Enfield, MPA<br />
Community Support Administrator<br />
Office of the County Manager<br />
Washoe County, Nevada<br />
Voice: 775.328.2009<br />
FAX:  775.328.2718&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/418/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuisance Ordinance Meeting &amp; County Budget</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/407</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/407#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Tone, County Outreach Coordinator for the Citizen’s Advisory Board (CAB) process, sends in these items:
§         A workshop on the draft Administrative Ordinance will be held on April 21. The event will be held at Bartley Ranch in the Ranch House. The meet will begin no earlier that 6 pm.  The date for the draft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Tone, County Outreach Coordinator for the Citizen’s Advisory Board (CAB) process, sends in these items:</p>
<p>§         A workshop on the draft Administrative Ordinance will be held on April 21. The event will be held at Bartley Ranch in the Ranch House. The meet will begin no earlier that 6 pm.  The date for the draft nuisance ordinance workshop has not been set. For more information, please visit http://www.washoecounty.us/nuisances. If you have any additional concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to call Bob Well at (775) 328-3623.</p>
<p>§         You can track our budget process through our website www.washoecounty.us (visit the link “Be a Part of the Budget Process”).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/407/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>East WV CAB Followup</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/405</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/405#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Tone, County Outreach Coordinator for the Citizen&#8217;s Advisory Board (CAB) process, sent these clarifications on march&#8217;s CAB meeting:
Regarding the South Valley ’s Area Plan, Washoe County is filing a letter of objection with the Regional Planning Commission (RPC). The letter will outline the reasons for conformance to the regional plan. The RPC approved the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Tone, County Outreach Coordinator for the Citizen&#8217;s Advisory Board (CAB) process, sent these clarifications on march&#8217;s CAB meeting:</p>
<p>Regarding the South Valley ’s Area Plan, Washoe County is filing a letter of objection with the Regional Planning Commission (RPC). The letter will outline the reasons for conformance to the regional plan. The RPC approved the finding of conformance by a 5-4 vote; however, the action requires a 2/3 majority. Thus it was a technical denial. It is arguable that the reasons given for the denial was based on information not related or included in the South Valley ’s Area Plan and also not technically sound.  If the item is not approved at the RPC, staff will appeal the decision to the Regional Planning Governing Board. We understand that this is frustrating for all who have spent countless hours working on this plan. We will continue to keep you up to date on important meetings and events.</p>
<p>§         There is no cap on the total number of septic systems in Washoe Valley .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/405/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March EWV CAB Meeting Report</title>
		<link>http://washoevalley.org/archives/403</link>
		<comments>http://washoevalley.org/archives/403#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washoevalley.org/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neither the Washoe County Sheriff&#8217;s Dpt. nor the Reno Fire Dpt. were there, so no report.
Suzie Rogers, the Public Safety Officer reported her dpt. is the office you get when you call 911.  If it&#8217;s a fire or safety issue, they transfer the call to the South Dispatch Office, 832-4110. She informed us that if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither the Washoe County Sheriff&#8217;s Dpt. nor the Reno Fire Dpt. were there, so no report.<br />
Suzie Rogers, the Public Safety Officer reported her dpt. is the office you get when you call 911.  If it&#8217;s a fire or safety issue, they transfer the call to the South Dispatch Office, 832-4110. She informed us that if they receive either a 1 or a 9 call with a delay after, it defaults to 911. They must respond to all those calls thinking it could be an emergency.  Unfortunately sometimes an elder or young person tries to call and hangs up and starts over, which causes problems.<br />
NVEnergy personnel was supposed to be present to address power outage concerns.  Unfortunately they were not, so that&#8217;s continued until next month.  Patty who lives at the end of the line on Ormsby Lane in the Lyon area expressed concerns about an annoying external noise source, a rather loud humming which goes off &amp; on.  She says it&#8217;s getting louder and more unpleasant and really bothers her &amp; her dog.  Patty has contacted them twice.<br />
Someone asked about the status of the Lowden property on Eastlake.  Sarah Tone said if they sell one lot or more, owners would have to submit a tentative subdivision map, which has not been done yet.  That would have to go through the CAB.  The map on the signs is not official.<br />
Dave Harrison reported on the Scenic By-ways Committee, saying it is tentatively approved, but probably will not be finalized for a year or two.<br />
NDOW was not present, but informed Dave Harrison, who reported they were going to do a burn in Scripps this month , but could not get the dozers in time.  The goal was to burn out the invasive weeds, mostly whitetop, which had gotten out of control.  It may be done in April.<br />
Sarah Tone, Outreach coordinator for Washoe County, informed about the budget, saying if had to be cut 47 million, 6% of the cuts in safety, and 36 -40% in libraries, museums, art, etc.  There will be a meeting at the end of April, ways to reduce CAB costs.  This will go into effect July 1st.  They now have a new email set-up for the public with worksheets and comment forms.  Sarah said don&#8217;t respond to this email.<br />
The South Valleys Area Plan, Dave Harrison, the chair, reported it could go back to the Regional Governing Board again at the county&#8217;s request.  Ann York said she was there, and it was voted down 6, who favored, and 5 against.  It took 2/3 majority to pass, so it didn&#8217;t pass.  The main reason was because of the wells &amp; septics, some feeling it would not be good for the general public or general planning since some wells are going dry and some others have nitrates.<br />
Ann York said her &amp; Valerie Wiliams have served their 6 year terms on the CAB, so in June there will be 2 vacancies in the CAB.  She stated that this valley needs all the help it can get.<br />
Meeting ended.<br />
Submited by Ann York, CAB member</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washoevalley.org/archives/403/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
