|
Home
About
Articles
History
Outdoors
Local Services
Links
Lifestyle
Photos
Garden Tips
Submissions
Map of WV
-HOT TOPICS-
Scenic Byway
South Valleys Area Plan
Nuisance Ordinance
Revision
Regional Open Space Plan
Fire Prepardness

Sign Up For New
Content Notification!

Featured Local Blogs
Local Food Northern
Nevada
Tucker Times
A Fresh Path
Gem's Musings
Nevada
Backyard Traveler
The urban blog
WildWashoe
Ellen
Hopkins Amazon Blog
Cory Farley
Sleepy Cat Hollow
10 Things You
Can Do To be involved in washoevalley.org
1. Send in a WV story or quip.
2. Send in a photo.
3. or a recipe, poem or question..
4. Tell someone about this site.
5. Check out the site regularly.
6. Attend a meeting and tell us about it.
7. Report on our schools.
8. Report on our churches.
9. support local businesses.
10. share your WV history.

Many links to documents
(PDF) require this free program.
Download it by clicking
on the logo

Washoe
County TV
Schedule
The county cable channel 17 has the county
commissioner meetings, a news show, and various public info segments.
|
Draw Me A Picture!
Regional Planning explained
with a flowchart. |
|
Meet our staff:
 |
| |
Archive Feb 2007 Thru May
2007
|
Lost a Dog?
AIREDALE TERRIER
found loose at 7-11 in
Washoe Valley
on Saturday 5-26.
He is at the new
Humane Society in Reno.
It is an older
Male-Airedale Terrier found at 7-11. Has a collar with no tag.
May 29, 2007
Comment on this ariticle
|
|
Thanks Neighbors!
From one of our hard-working volunteers:
"The East Washoe Valley CAB & Working Group would
like to thank you TREMENDOUSLY for all your Washoe Valley support we
needed last night (Tuesday-ed) at the Washoe County Board of
Commissioners meeting! You were all respectful & listened intently. We
could FEEL your support, & so could the Commissioners!
You were great!
The citizens working the most intently on the Plan were Bill Naylor,
Monica Frank, Carol Christenson, Susan Juetten, Bob Rusk, & Jane
Countryman. We also would like to thank Rick, the editor, for his
fantastic signs on both ends of Eastlake.
When you see them, please thank them for all their hard work."
I, as editor of your community website, would also like
to thank everyone who has contributed information, corrections and other
content to the site to help keep us Washoe Valley residents informed on
the issues.
The SVAP issue has not gone away and certainly the
threat of runaway development never will either. Other issues like the
new nuisance ordinance, annexation threats and the potential sell-off of
surrounding BLM land will continue to be topics that will affect us and
and which we will be following. Keep participating and be a part of your
great community!
May 24, 2007
Comment on this article
|
 |
|
Huge Turnout at
Commission Meeting
Planning Commission
Told "Fix It" By Commissioners
Approximately 300+ residents made the trip into Reno
despite the rush hour traffic to attend the County
Commission Meeting with the South Valleys Area Plan on the agenda as a
public hearing. During the public comment portion of the meeting, before
official testimony on the SVAP agenda item, a 30 year resident spoke as
he said he could not attend the later item. He praised the residents for
being diligent in advising the county and for attending the meeting. He
concluded by saying the only fault he could see in the residents is
electing the current batch of commissioners. Applause and laughter went
up and Mr. Larkin, the chairman of the Board of Commissioners chastised
the crowd in a stern tone that any applause or laughter would result in
the public being expelled from the chamber. Being humbled, we waited for
a recess to be completed and the meeting to continue.
Upon the taking up of the SVAP agenda item, the head of
the Planning Dept. spoke of the many acres of open space now existing in
Washoe Valley, 37,000 acres by his count ( is he counting all public
lands up to the extent of the hydrologic valley- up to all the ridgetops?)
He also went on to say that there are only 1990 lots of 5 acres or less
available for development in Washoe Valley. I think his point was that
we should be happy with all that we have.
The commissioners, Humke and Sferrazza, in particular
noted that they had been alerted by residents that the SVAP draft
version that the county was circulating was not the one approved by the
planning commission and that could lead to confusion. They indicated
they would probably ask for the hearing be rescheduled to a later date.
It was decided that a 60 day continuance may be appropriate. They were
to decide on that at the end of the meeting.
Public
testimony began with those who signed up to speak. Many were from the
working group, the CABS and others who are always working for the valley
and others who are ordinary citizens concerned about their quality of
life, the beauty of the valley and the future of the valleys wildlife.
Many residents gave testimony starting with
representatives of four groups: the East and West WV CAB boards, the
West Washoe Homeowners and the WV Landowners Assoc. All were in
agreement that the plan is flawed and incomplete and needs more work.
The main concerns were:
-
The Weston/Lowden Development: The subdivision
itself was protested as being out of character with the valley and
also the precedence it would set. It is feared that if this
particular landowner gets special treatment and privileges than any
landowner can expect the same thing making an area plan and zoning
meaningless.
-
The commercial zone in Old Washoe City: The planners
tried to explain that the area actually has less commercial
potential in the new plan than the old. But residents pointed out
that according to the county map with the SVAP, the physical area is
actually expanded. Others questioned the inclusion of multi-unit
dwellings and the long list of acceptable businesses allowed under
the proposed plan.
Other residents involved with the process cited the
planning depts slipshod work and lack of interest in residents input
while others pleaded for preserving the valleys rural, scenic and
natural character.
The attorney for Mr. Serpa, large landowner and
developer in Washoe Valley, stated that it was his opinion that the SVAP
had no right to try to regulate water issues in the valley as that is
superseded by the state's water agreements with landowners through the
water rights process.
Mr. Lowden spoke saying he was a regular guy and liked
the rural lifestyle also and looked forward to taking the matter up at
the next meeting.
I left before the commissioners ended the meeting but
this correspondent has the final notes:
"What a fantastic turnout we had at the Commission
meeting last night. The public comments were great. The crowd
respectful. Commissioner Humke supported us, as did Galloway and
Sferrazza. Commissioner Larkin said some nice things and with Weber
joining in, the vote was unanimous to send the SVAP back to the Planning
Commission with direction to fix the plan.
It was just wonderful to see so many people turn out to support Washoe
Valley. I was told a huge stack of fliers were mailed in, and lots &
lots of e-mails and letters of support were received.
Thank you all for doing such a fantastic job for Washoe Valley."
See the RGJ.com article on the hearing
here.
May 23, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
"They are a bunch of
Chicken Littles down there,"
Weston Lowden Attorney
Characterizes Washoe Valley Residents
Developers to Citizens:
MORONS!
The attorney for the proposed Weston/Lowden development
in northeast Washoe Valley asserts that Washoe Valley Residents fears of
continued Reno urban sprawl are unfounded. What he bases this opinion on
in contrast to history is not revealed in this
RGJ article. It does show the contempt that government and
development forces have for residents/voters/taxpayers.
Faced with the lessons learned from rampant development
in every direction from Reno, Washoe Valley residents are apparently
foolish to fear that it could happen to them. We are told to trust in
government and the better judgment of big money.
"They're sticking their heads in the sand, saying no
growth, no growth," Mollath said. "They are going to get municipal water
and sewer whether they like it or not. They can have their rural
lifestyles. But the only ones who are going to be able to live there are
cows."
Oddly enough some think a rural lifestyle is foolish and
that everyone's ultimate goal should be to live in a phony environment
of concrete and asphalt with the citizens picking up the bill for
maintenance and services while the developers walk away with the
profits. Lip service is paid to "rural lifestyles", "history", "scenic
values", "open space" but the real intent is to maximize the profit for
the development driven economy of Reno.
They may be right, showing up at Tuesdays meeting may be
an exercise in futility against our development-drug crazed government
but it is our duty as citizens to assume we are still in charge and make
the effort to influence our government, community and lifestyles.
May 21, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Washoe Valley Voices
I'm sorry, but it's too late by about 30 years to "stay
rural'. The Valley has changed dramatically in the last 50 years that
I've been here and it's going to change even more as long as money takes
an interest in it. I see that as being as unavoidable as all the
(relatively) new neighbors that I have.
I would propose that Washoe and Pleasant Valleys provide a "green zone"
both visually and emotionally that will be otherwise be lacking along
the drive from the Stead area to Gardnerville unless somebody starts
pushing for a Zero Growth belt. I would challenge developers and
planners alike to consider, not only the future of this area, but near
future property values.
I'm led to believe that property values in Boulder, Colorado skyrocketed
when they passed 'zero growth'. With unrestricted growth in both Reno
and Carson City it will not be long before the two grow together. I'd
think that it would be very short sighted of everyone concerned if that
were allowed to happen.
In the interest of allowing all you newbies to present a common front,
I'll pass on attending tonight's meeting.
____________________________
Dear Mr Sferrazza,
I am asking and counting on you as a neighbor and
our commissioner to help us keep our rural lifestyle as well as the
home of many animals from being developed and destroyed. You will
be asked tonight to vote yay or nay to a developer that wants strip
much of the beauty and history from Washoe Valley and build just for
the sake of building.
A couple reasons not to vote for this developers plan from my heart
are...
Water and the lack of it. For most of my life I have lived in
Nevada and loved almost every minute of it. It has been talked
about for many years that we are a desert and that water is a
precious resource, but then why do we just keep building knowing
that it will someday be stretched too thin and be like Gold?
Wild Animals that we should be able to see and tell our kids about
will soon have no where to live and be driven from their homes. I
don't want to try to explain to my kids that we once had wild horses
and deer and beautiful birds but we chased them away.
Last.... This not California or Chicago or even Las Vegas. Not
everyone wants to live in a paved, over lit traffic laden town or
neighborhood where there is a large store on every corner and people
scrambling to get somewhere. Some of us bought in Washoe Valley
because we were looking to get away from that and we would like to
maintain the way of life we have. We are not hillbillies we are
adults that work hard for what we have and a sense of community.
Please help us to maintain our way of life and represent us with a
vote against the development in Washoe Valley tonight.
Thank you for your service and time. Pete;s response:
I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS AND YOU WILL CONSIDER THEM WHEN WE
VOTE ON THIS ISSUE.
THANKS FOR YOUR INPUT,
PETE
_______________________
I heard it said that
the residents of Washoe
Valley
do not understand their intent. So they have changed their stance.
But what’s going on
in the back of their heads?
We just went through
a development plan cycle. When are people going to learn that planners
plan! When you’re a planner you can not leave anything alone, otherwise
your not planning, i.e. doing your job.
The big mistake with
working with planners is that people become complacent. They want to be
nice with people and expect that planners will work with you and see
things your way. Well, after the last planning commission meeting,
people may have learned that it’s not a two way street.
I remember one of the
first meetings with the ‘planner’. He told the small group of people
that they would start with a small group of homes and we’d get use to
it. The people I was with had other ideas of what needed to be done. In
the end none of the real action items suggested by those in hearing
range were enacted, but we did get all his plans and then some. With a
little fancy frills along the ridge tops.
Then at the last
meeting, I remember one of the panel members saying that they could not
tell the developer what to do with their property. Well I think they
could, that’s what building codes are all about, but at that point I
knew that all hope was lost.
The only way people
are going to stop the rush of development and
Reno to over come all obstacles, is to vote out
all the commissioners that side with the developers. Of course the
people will not. They vote for the names they know and those are the
names that have the biggest and most signs in every neighborhood come
election time. Guess where all that money comes from for all those big
signs? Yep, it’s the people who meet separately with them, in their
offices, when they ask for that favor back which helped them get
reelected.
Just before the last
election, there was a list published someplace, which someone had
complied, showing the votes of those running for office who voted with
the developers. Mr. Humke's name stood out in that list.
Now I think I heard him say we don’t understand.
The bottom line is that he doesn’t
understand what we have in Washoe
Valley
is special for Nevada.
But in the end, the only way we have a
slight chance of saving
Washoe Valley
is to vote them out of office. But of course that will never happen,
since the developers will have bought all their friends big signs that
will get them reelected. And those that vote against them will have the
uphill battle against well funded and lawyer backed builder friends.
We’ll show up at
tomorrows meeting and fill the room. We’ll voice our concerns and
wishes. Perhaps they will nod or smile, but in the end. Late some night,
after all have left the meeting room. They will vote to give their
developer friends, what they want to make them a few million $’s more
and the voters will reelect them again next year.
Then last of all,
we’ll get stuck with the bills.
_________________________
To Whom
It May Concern,
We as
residents of Washoe Valley and long time residents of Nevada, we
wish to say that we stand to keep this Valley and its immediate
surrounding area's free from the greedy and ignorant developers and
land grabbers that want to destroy everything in their path and we
hope that starting now you take a hard look at what your doing to
our area around here for you are destroying some of the nicest land
in Nevada with you development. I also think that the Commissioners
of this county and the Reno City Council need to look at what they
have done and are doing with all of this also. They are supposed to
represent us as elected officials and do what is wanted by the
people that put them in office. So If you don't like listening to
the residents of this valley and other area's of this county then
you need to let some that will. We demand that this area be left
alone and no more development is allowed now or never. Go out to
the baron desert and build you ugly developments. I also feel that
your south meadows is an I-SOAR to look at and what a mess. This is
Nevada not California nor Chicago nor New York. So leave it that
way and take those ideas back there and keep them there.
___________________________
I wanted to comment on
Adrien Freund's message. He says the Supporters of Scripps letter
misrepresents the area plan. Well, I wrote that letter and will vouch
for the accuracy of my statements. A list of references has been sent
to the Commissioners that demonstrates exactly where that information
can be found, such as the Regional Plan. You probably are aware, but I
wanted to point out that the term density is different than actual lot
size. Density is the area divided by 5 acres (or whatever size). The
Weston/Lowden property will have half acre lots, and 20% of the lots
will be 1 acre or less. This is not allowed in the Regional Plan and
other documents that are speaking of actual lot size. They say no
sub-division of land less than 5 acres in Washoe Valley. In addition
the 5 acre minimum was upheld in the Serpa vs. Washoe County Supreme
Court case in (I think it was 1995).
___________________________________
We have currently resided at 395 Flicker Circle for the past 29
years back of property on Jumbo Creek.
My wife and myself would like to address our concerns on developing
on 5 acre parcels or less.
Our first concern is the water issue, with only one aquifer that
feeds the entire valley, we had to deepen our well in 1993, and we
fear many would lose their existing wells, since the depth of many
of these wells is 100 feet or less, we ourselves could not afford to
re-drill.
Our second concern is traffic, more traffic than what we deal with
now, especially going from Reno and trying to turn onto Eastlake
Blvd. Going southbound on U.S. 395 always backs up especially around
commute time.
Our third concern is the wildlife habitat, if there is any left in
the area's being proposed for development. The new freeway
extension, if it ever get's done will probably wipe out any habitat,
and nobody seems to be concerned where the water will come from,
just build, build, and more building.
Are you trying to annex our area for the city, so we can pay
additional taxes? and take away our quiet life?
|
|
County Planning and
Commissioner Humke Respond
Read Mr. Humke's response to the concerns of a local
resident and Mr. Adrian P. Freund, AICP, Director, Washoe County
Community Development written response to the concerns of Washoe Valley
residents in this submission forwarded by a local resident on the
SVAP Page.
It looks like our county government is already reacting
to broad negative reaction to the SVAP and the potential crowd at the
meeting Tuesday. Either the planning department is pushing ahead with
their own agenda or done a miserable job at communicating the SVAP to
the public. The plan talks about preserving the scenic, historic, rural
character of the valley but are those sentiments backed up with
regulatory teeth to prevent outside developers from exploiting the
valley piece by piece?
May 19, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Call To Action!
Washoe Valley is at a crossroads and you can take part
in the path to the future. We all live here because we consider the
valley a special place for its natural beauty, recreational
opportunities and sense of being apart from the excesses of both Reno
and Carson City.
That could all change starting this year as the county
seeks to fit Washoe Valley into the development machine that has
drastically changed the "quality of life" from Mt. Rose Highway north.
Even if you don't value the intangible qualities of beauty, recreation
and quality of life, will you be sacrificing future property values if
you stay silent now and Washoe Valley becomes just another
mega-development?
You are not alone! Signs are up, postcards are being
sent, and residents are all being urged to attend the County
Commissioners Meeting at 5:30pm this coming Tuesday in a last ditch
attempt to impress upon the county that residents/taxpayers/voters are
in charge, not corporate development machines seeking raw material for
their insatiable appetites.
You voice may be , your journey into community
participation may be a waste of time. But this is your chance to
participate as a citizen in a matter that affects you directly as the
founding fathers intended!
If you choose not to attend, see the following
articles for addresses where you may send your thoughts to our
commissioners!
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
SVAP Not Valid
washoevalley.org has obtained the following articles
that show the SVAP (South Valleys Area Plan) does not meet the
guidelines of the TM Regional Plan, WC Development Code, and Nevada
State Water Engineer. Yet the county is still insisting that this is the
blueprint for Washoe Valley in the future. Read the specific points here
on the SVAP Page under
SVAP NON-CONFORMANCE ISSUES.
A letter
from the Washoe Valley Working Group (a volunteer group who has been
working to advise the county on the residents desires) in advance of the
May 22nd meeting.
Documentation for the above letters. Review all these
documents on the SVAP Page
in preparation for Tuesdays Meeting.
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
. |
|
from a correspondent:
Developer Gets Special
Treatment
As a matter of information the area that is currently designated for development under the 'specific plan'
is the 700+ acres from Spicer (just north of the fire station on Eastlake) all the way to the corner of
Eastlake and 395. In other words just about all the visible land opposite Little Washoe lake (east).
Under the 'specific plan', the owners Weston and Lowden would be able to put 140 homes on that site.
The 'specific plan' also allows in that 140 homes to have 27 "casitas", that is, homes on 1/2 acre
clustered together.
The county planning dept. is giving this landowner special status by addressing his plan specifically in the Area Plan.
This will give his project special status to overcome any barriers in the future, it is feared. Typically, high density
development is approved if it is in the "character of the community". This project will make high density housing "within
the character of the community" since it will be existing in Washoe Valley.- ed.
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
from a correspondent:
Washoe City To Be Commercial Hub
Another area slated for
development is old Washoe City, which will be expanded and called the
"Old Washoe City Historic Mixed-use Commercial District".
It will be possible to have hotels with convention facilities,
condominiums, apartments over rows of shops, helicopter services,
undertaking services, schools, RV Parks, and Major Public Facilities,
and gun clubs, like skeet shooting.
This is the same type of
zoning that allowed a huge warehouse building to be built on my
residential street in New Washoe City that is surrounded on three sides
by homes. It Can Happen to You!- ed.
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
from a correspondent: Write A
Letter, Attend a Meeting For Your "Quality of Life"
Dear Friends of Washoe Valley, outdoor
recreation, and wildlife;
Some of you already know about the problems we‘ve had with Washoe
County’s update of the South Valleys Area Plan (SVAP). I’m writing
today because I know you must share our concerns over the loss of rural
areas, water, and wildlife habitat to uncontrolled growth. We
desperately need your help to keep Washoe Valley rural and to protect
its natural resources for wildlife, recreation, and open space.
I am asking for your support in the form of a letter to the Washoe
County Board of County Commissioners, protesting the South Valley Area
Plan update, as written. The SVAP will be heard at the WC Commission
meeting Tuesday, May 22, 2007 @ 5:30 pm. This plan must be denied,
and revised in order to bring it into conformance with the Truckee
Meadows Regional Plan (TMRP) and protect rural Washoe Valley.
The SVAP includes Washoe Valley, Pleasant Valley & Steamboat, but I will
concentrate on Washoe Valley. Washoe Valley is the only area of the
SVAP that is identified as a Rural Development Area in the Regional Plan
and, as such, is given more protection. The intent and policies of the
Regional Plan take precedence over the County’s plan, and can help keep
Washoe Valley rural, and open space, recreation and wildlife areas
available and viable in the future.
With respect to Washoe Valley, the SVAP has four conditions that must be
revised in order for the plan to be in full conformance with the
Regional Plan & the Washoe County Development Code.
Washoe County;
• must not allow additional development that requires the
provision of municipal service, (such as municipal wells or water
supply/wastewater treatment facilities to serve new development);
• must not allow new divisions of land that create parcels of
less than 5 acres;
• must prohibit amendments to zoning that increase the density
or intensity to allow parcels of less than 5 acres in size within Washoe
Valley in order to protect water quality; and
• must not expand the current commercial area to include
Mixed-use in General Rural or residential areas; or introduce land uses
currently not allowed in General Rural and/or Neighborhood Commercial.
All of the above provisions are found in this SVAP and all must be
removed in order to keep population growth to a manageable level and
protect our natural resources.
There are two areas in Washoe Valley targeted for development that do
not conform to the TMRP. The first is a Specific Plan for the
Weston/Lowden subdivision in east Washoe Valley with parcels smaller
than 5 acres, that will require municipal services. This property is
bordered by public lands on three sides; to the west it overlooks little
Washoe Lake and part of Scripps WMA, to the east & south is BLM land.
There are development constraints, such as steep slopes, Mule deer
winter range & migration route, water supply and wastewater disposal
problems. Within this subdivision, the SVAP grants “special
consideration, for water supply and wastewater treatment”, including
solutions that “need further regulatory relief”. We can only imagine
the harm that the proposed “regulatory relief” will lead to for the
surrounding public lands, lake/wetlands and private domestic well
owners.
The second non-conforming area is the Mixed-use expansion of old Washoe
City at the north end of Washoe Valley. To the south, old Washoe City
borders the recently acquired Winter’s Ranch open space, which serves as
a buffer for Scripps WMA. The expansion of this area is planned for
urban/suburban type development of residential and commercial uses mixed
with civic and agricultural uses. Many of these uses are of increased
densities that will require water/wastewater treatment facilities.
Included are hotels with convention facilities, helicopter services,
schools, condos, and traditional agricultural uses like animal
slaughter.
Both of these non-conforming development areas in the SVAP MUST BE
DENIED and REVISED to bring them into conformance with the Truckee
Meadows Regional Plan, which takes precedence over local government
planning documents.
We have been working very hard on the SVAP and have made progress. Your
letters of support for Washoe Valley can make the difference. Please
write and tell the WC Commissioners that the South Valley’s Area Plan
should be denied and brought into conformance with the Truckee Meadows
Regional Plan in order to protect Washoe Valley. Whether you write in
your official capacity or as a private citizen, Please Write. The WC
Commission meeting is Tuesday, May 22, @ 5:30 pm.
Washoe County Board of County Commissioners:
Commissioner David Humke
<dhumke@washoecounty.us>
Commissioner Pete Sferrazza
<psferrazza@washoecounty.us>
Commissioner Jim Galloway
<jgalloway@washoecounty.us>
Commissioner Bob Larkin
<rlarkin@washoecounty.us>
Commissioner Bonnie Weber
<bweber@washoecounty.us>
IThank you so much for your interest, your attention and your support
for Washoe Valley,
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Keep Washoe Valley Rural
Signs
The Washoe Valley Working Group (the group of residents
who have spent the last couple of years providing Washoe County our
input on the South Valleys Area Plan) has put up signs throughout the
valley urging residents to attend the next Commissioners meeting.
Despite the working groups pleas for retaining the rural
character of the valley the county has crafted a plan that actually
opens the door for mass residential and commercial development starting
now.
Does every beautiful rural area in western Nevada have
to be consumed to feed the corporate development furnace? Isn't Washoe
County here to serve the residents/citizens/voters/taxpayers and not
corporations?
See the following article on information for attending
the meeting or sending a letter or email. Let them know you care!
May 15, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
This just in from our correspondent:
Look Out!
Houses Instead of Horses
Did you know that the Washoe County Planning Commission has decided
that the best way to minimize the development of Washoe Valley is to
build houses?
Did you know that the same planning commission is taking steps that
would soon allow the TMSA to provide services to expand into
Washoe Valley which would subsequently allow further housing development
in our valley? (Think Spanish Springs).
A few Washoe Valley residents from both the east and west side have for
almost 3 years tried to prevent the incursion of housing development
into the valley and have been turned away at each meeting with
the Planning Commission. This same commission seems determined to change
the status of Washoe Valley as a Rural Development Area into something
quite different, with expanded commercial potential, expanded
potential for housing development.
The residents of Washoe Valley are now down to their last chance
to halt this urban spread. The Board of County Commissioners will hear
the recommendations of the Planning Commission to approve the South
Valleys Area Plan on May 22nd (stay tuned to this site for the
exact time and place on the agenda). This is our only remaining
opportunity to speak out, please come to the meeting and voice your
opinion. If you can’t attend please contact the county commissioners
by phone, e-mail or
letter. You may also e-mail your local CAB members (West
WV CAB click on "roster") (East
WV CAB click on "roster") and they will forward them to the
commissioners.
Remember what Double Diamond Ranch (at Damonte Parkway)looked
like a few years ago and have you seen it lately?- ed.
May 6, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Mosquito Spraying to Start
That buzzing overhead isn't a swarm of mosquitoes full
of West Nile Virus, its the Vector-borne illness folks spraying our
wetlands with a non-toxic mosquito killer stuff from a helicopter. This
from the
RGJ.com article:
"Aerial spraying to suppress mosquitoes starts today and continues
every two weeks on Thursday through October in Washoe Valley, Rosewood
Lakes, Bella Vista ranch, Double Diamond and Damonte ranch, Stead,
Lemmon Valley and Spanish Springs Valley.
Officials ask residents to clear yards of free-standing water, use
repellent, wear long sleeves and long pants in mosquito prone areas,
repair window screens and vaccinate horses."
More about the
"vector-borne" disease program at Washoe County.
Here is the
CDC
homepage on the disease. This disease is scary because most may not
realize they have it, or think it is the flu. But for some it can cause
severe symptoms even permanent damage or paralysis. Hope for the best
but prepare for the worst!
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Don't Lower the Bridge, Raise
The Earth!
It seems the "big bridge" for the new freeway is giving
another construction company fits. The new contractor is proposing to
use massive amounts of fill in the canyon below the bridge so that the
huge trusses can be placed without the use of cranes. How a company can
bid on a project and then change the rules is beyond me but then I am
not in that league. Did NDOT design something that can't be built or is
it just at the mercy of the contractors? Here is the
whole story here.
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Students Battle Weeds in
Washoe Valley
"In the fight against tall whitetop, 20 college students
from across the country have become warriors in eradicating the weed
from the Truckee Meadows, cutting the vegetation weeds and spraying
herbicide in local parks this week." in this
article from RGJ.com . Tall whitetop is an invasive weed that takes
over riparian areas and edges out native plants to the detriment of
local wildlife, plants and water quality. More information on tall
whitetop is
here (pdf) from the University of
Nevada Cooperative Extension.
May 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Spring Bonnet Fashions
Trish Freed of "A Dog's Life Canine Retreat Center" here
in the valley submitted this photo and note: "I
was driving home from running
my
dogs near Ormsby Lane and had to do a double take when I saw
this goat. Thank you neighbor for the smile!"
May 6, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
County Sends Greetings and an
Update
Our County Outreach Coordinator sends this note:
Hello
South
Valley
Residents!
Thank you for participating in the
Citizen Advisory Board meetings, special working groups, and public
hearings regarding the update of the South Valley Area Plan. I want to
keep you updated on the upcoming BCC meeting that you have expressed
interest in attending.
Board of County Commissioners, May 22. The meeting will be held at
the 9th Street
Complex, in Reno,
Nevada. The meeting begins at 2:00 p.m. The
South
Valley Area Plan is a
public hearing and will be heard after 5:30 p.m. For the agenda, please
visit the
BCC webpage (www.washoecounty.us
and hit the link on the right “County
Commission”). The agenda
will be posted one week prior to the meeting.
In addition, the Washoe County Planning
Commission will hear a related short agenda item on May 1. The purpose
of this item is to clarify statements made at the February 20 Planning
Commission meeting and ensure that the Planning Commissioners’ decision
was based on accurate information. Although not frequently used, this is
a standard procedure used to verify statements made during public
meetings. At the May 1 meeting, the Planning Commission may make a
motion to reconsider the action taken at the February 20 meeting. The
meeting will be held at the County Commission Chambers on
9th Street. The item is at the end
of the meeting agenda.
If the Planning Commission chooses to
rehear the item, then the South Valley’s Updated Area Plan will be heard
at the May 15 Planning Commission meeting. The options for the
Commission will be either to confirm or modify their previous action.
Thank you, again, for your time and
efforts! For additional information on upcoming meetings please visit
the
Planning Commission or
Board of County Commissioners websites. Please also view your
District Webpage for more information on events in your area. You
are always welcome to email (stone@washoecounty.us)
or call me at (775) 328-2721. I look forward to seeing you at your next
CAB meeting!
May 6, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Get Hitched At Thunder Canyon
Here's a cool blog
"Sierra Bride" for those of you contemplating a wedding this spring.
I think its cool as the layout is really great for a blog. Anyway, They
have an article with some pics of the wedding services available at the
Thunder Canyon Golf Resort on the west side of the valley. They also
have a restaurant there, "Franktown Grill" that we have to review
sometime.
May 6, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Anti-Annexation Letters
Needed Now!
This just in from our correspondent: "I have just learned that
AB 160 will be heard in front of the Senate Government Affairs
Committee next Wednesday, May 9 at 1:30 PM in Room #2149. As it
stands right now, it is second on the agenda so it should be heard
not too long after 1:30. E-mails supporting this bill are
essential now. They should be sent to Senator Warren Hardy,
Chairman, Senate Government Affairs Committee, at
whardy@sen.state.nv.us.
If you can get this information out as quickly as possible, it is
greatly appreciated. With the South Valleys Area Plan on the near
horizon, it seems like everything is starting to happen at once."
May 3, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Local Saddle Maker Honored
Bill Maloy of Washoe Valley is to be honored by his alma
mater, The
College of the Sequoias at their 2007 Hall of Fame Dinner Saturday.
Bill earned an art degree in the 1950s and has since gone on to become a
master saddlemaker and artisan.
Bill and his beautiful work have been featured in
several articles in the
RGJ,
Reno News
& Review, and
Western Horseman among others. "When I was in high school, I took
a craft class and they had leather for us to work on. That's where I
first learned to carve leather and really took an interest in saddle
work. With some 50 years of saddle-making experience, Maloy creates
saddles in the style developed by the Visalia Stock Saddle Company in
the late 1800s and early 1900s."
photo by Reno News & Review
May 3, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
West WV CAB Meeting for April
& May Agenda
Topics that were discussed in the
latest meeting were the South Valleys Area Plan, open burning,
illegal dumping, speed limit signs and the red flags adorning them, and
drilling for water in WV for the Sierra Reflections Development. NDOT
and the SVAP are expected to be on the next agenda.
May Agenda: Updates on the SVAP and Nuisance Ordinance Revision are
expected as well as presentations on water rights and NDOT activities.
May 2, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
AB 160: Annexation Update
We received this from our correspondent on the progress
of AB160 concerning residents right to choose annexation- or not. For
those of you who wrote letters to the legislature: Good Job!
"AB 160 (with minimal amendments) passed the Assembly unanimously
and is on its way to the Senate where it will probably encounter
much rougher sledding. The Senate hasn't quite finished work on all
its bills, but, as soon as it has, the working group is laying plans
to meet with the chairman of the Senate Government Affairs committee
to start the campaign for passage.
E-mails to the committee in support of the bill will, of course,
be essential. When we have names, etc. nailed down, I'll let you
know. But, at least for a scant few moments, we had a victory."
May 2, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Local Driver Races Sprint
Cars
Ever noticed those little race cars being hauled around
on trailers in New Washoe City? One of our local residents races them at
the Reno-Fernley raceway
east of Reno in this
article featuring recent race action. Good,
noisy, rowdy old fashioned auto racing is alive and well there and at
the track in Fallon. It is a blast for a "something completely
different" outing on a Saturday. Go and cheer Bill on!
May 2, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Can Do! Washoe Valley?
EDAWN, or the Economic Development Authority for Western
Nevada is apparently including Washoe Valley in a big push to build,
pave, pour and plunder Western Nevada in their Can Do! advertising
campaign. While more and more residents are wondering where development
will end and rural lifestyle will begin, government and developers are
pushing to urbanize the county, ala Vegas North. The strategy is to
provide jobs to locals while bringing in new residents that need jobs
and then provide jobs for them and so on to "infinity and beyond". See a
nice story in Carson city's community website
here.
If anyone knows what their plans for Washoe Valley are,
let all of us know...
May 2, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Roads To Be Preserved
Upcoming road construction projects were previewed in
this
RGJ article. "Road Preservation" is earmarked for Washoe Valley. We
assume that means crack sealing and maybe chip sealing some of our roads
this summer. Also planned is a roundabout for the notorious intersection
in southwest Reno at Kietzke and Neil with work on that starting in
June.
May 2, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Jumbo Grade Article
Nevada Magazine ex-publisher Rich Moreno writes up Jumbo
Grade and the ghost town of Jumbo in this entertaining article on his
blog, Nevada
Backyard Traveler. Scroll down the page as he has several other
articles about Washoe Valley on his site. Here's a
photo "then and now" of Jumbo.
May 2, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Vandals Strike Memorial
The family's memorial to Chelsea Morrison who was
tragically killed last June in a traffic accident (White Pine &
Esmeralda) is wondering why anyone would want to remove or vandalize it
in this letter.
It also serves as reminder that as warmer weather approaches adults and
unlicensed children will be zipping around the streets on
unlicensed ATV's and motorcycles and that everyone should exercise
caution.
April 23, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
WV Boy Scouts To Have
Ceremony- Public Invited
Chad Hirsch of troop 150 here in Washoe Valley wishes
to invite the community to the following event: "My eagle project
is taking place at 10:00 AM on the 28th of April. I would like to invite
the public to this event, at Washoe lake State Park. We will be retiring
200-400 worn American Flags, and also to educate anyone who attends the
proper care of the American Flag. The ceremonies will begin promptly at
10:00, and everyone is encouraged to bring a lunch if they wish to
attend."
April 23, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
More Shooting Enthusiasts in
Washoe Valley?
Washoe County Commissioners agreed to put a large area
of the north county off limits to guns last week in this
RGJ.com article and will those gun enthusiasts be looking for new
places to shoot? We have shared the hills with many shooters over
the years and have never had a problem with getting shot but several
have had dubious gun handling and safety skills. Hopefully they and an
increase in shooting won't ruin it for everybody.
This may be another case where actions in another part
of the county could affect us here in Washoe Valley.
By state law shooting is now banned within 5,000 feet of
a residence (1,000 feet for shotguns). The county can override that by
designating an area as a "Congested Area" where public safety may be
threatened.
April 20th, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Land in South Valley Slated
For Purchase
The county commission will consider putting 80 acres in
the south Washoe Valley on a list for purchase in the Southern Nevada
Public Lands sell-off program. The meeting will be at 1pm tomorrow
(Tuesday) in the commission chambers. If anyone know the particulars of
this purchase, let us know.
April 23, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Caught Between Two Dumps
Thinking about the Great Truckee Meadows Cleanup and
Earth Day got me thinking about our predicament here in Washoe Valley.
The Carson Landfill was really great- for about a month. When the
freeway was finished it was a breeze
to drive to and only cost about $10 a load. Then they raised it to a
minimum of $20 for Washoe Valley residents (unless you can convince them
you only have demolition or construction debris). Or, you can drive
downtown to the Reno Transfer Station. That is a 22 mile drive and $5 a
square yard (you can usually stuff 3-4 yards in a pickup). The Lockwood
landfill is 29 miles. The Carson Landfill is 15 miles (all measured form
New Washoe City). Normally, considering gas at $3 per gallon and at
10mpg it can cost $28 to dump in Reno and $29 at Carson. Then with
burning restrictions (totally necessary) I can see why some residents
are tempted to "dump in the desert".
We
should try to think of ways to make it easier and cheaper to discourage
illegal dumping in our beautiful hills.
All this makes taking advantage of our free voucher at
the Lockwood landfill really important if you are concerned with saving
a couple of bucks. It's also a good chance to take the family for a ride
and see what's new out east of Reno. We've got until Monday, April 30th.
April 20, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Washoe Valley
Cleanup Scheduled |
|
Everyday is "Earth Day" here in Washoe Valley and we don't know of any
specific activities here in the valley to mark the occasion. The
regional Earth Day
festivities will be at Idlewild Park in Reno.
May 12th will our day for community involvement in our doors
according to EWVCAB member Valerie Williams:: "The event is part of
the county-wide Great Truckee Meadows Community Clean-up day and it will
be held on May 12, from 8:30-noon. We will meet at the Jumbo Grade
trailhead. Our efforts will focus on clean-up along Jumbo Grade, where
there are several piles of trash. Citizens can either log on to
www.ktmb.org to sign up for the event, or call 851-5185 to sign up.
There will be breakfast and lunch served and after the event there is
going to be entertainment at Bartley Ranch Regional Park in Reno.
Volunteers will also receive t-shirts. I believe it would be helpful to
have local citizens bring pick-up trucks for hauling trash from clean-up
sites to the dumpsters - I think the dumpsters were be at the Jumbo
Grade trailhead, but the specifics are not yet finalized. I have agreed
to be the Site Coordinator. Gary Houk is bringing his Boy Scout troop."
April 20, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
WV Student Wins Scholarship
Congratulations to WV resident and grad student Kalani
Michell who has been named a Fulbright Scholar and plans to study the
effects of immigration on education in Germany reports this
article. The Fulbright Scholarship is sponsored by the the US Dept.
of State. Michell plans on getting her masters degree and becoming a
college professor. Hopefully her studies will find insights into the
problems of immigration and assimilation that many countries face.
April 20th, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
101 Ways To Burn Up Washoe
Valley
A 100 acre fire pushed by 50mph winds worked its way
upslope from southeast Washoe Valley the other night. Fortunately being
stopped by firefighters and snow before it really had a chance to take
off.
Reportedly the cause is a legal residential burn pile that had been
covered with dirt. I can see that this practice would allow the embers
to continue to smolder for a more complete burning while keeping the
embers from blowing- in a normal area. It seems that one should never
underestimate the power and tenacity of the Washoe Zephyr though. My dad
taught us that a fire outdoors was only safe to leave when you could put
your hand in the ashes. We poured alot of water on campfires.
I was reading a community website the other day that
discussed the potential fire danger in the woods is from "hikers and
campers". It seems to me from my casual observation that very few....
continued on the Franktown
Cafe Blog.
This
study
has this to say about local wildfire causes: The Carson City
community has a high ignition risk rating. There is a significant
history of wildfire and fire ignitions in the public lands surrounding
the community. High ignition rates are due to the moderate density fuel
in and around the community, the tendency for lightning storms during
the summer, and number of recreationists using the wildlands near the
community. Ignition risks fall into two categories - lightning and human
caused. Human caused ignitions can come from a variety of sources: fires
started along highways and roads from burning material thrown out of
vehicle windows, ignitions from auto accidents, off-road vehicles,
faulty power lines, ditch burning, debris burning in piles or burn
barrels, matches, target shooting, and fireworks. In Carson City,
ignitions have been caused almost equally by both human causes and
lightning.
This
site has a pie chart of past causes. Campfires are 1% of
causes and it doesn't differentiate between legit campers and yahoos.
April 19, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Crafty Development Forces At
Work
Developers, large landowners and progress-at-any-cost
government officials are hard at work coming up with devious ways of
subverting those who appreciate quality-of-life here in Washoe County
according to this
RGJ.com article.
Now, these forces have come up with their own bill that
Sparks Mayor Geno Martini describes as an end run around Assembly Bill
160. AB 160 is the bill sponsored by our own Assemblywoman Bonnie
Parnell that would put annexation in the hands of the community.
Assembly Bill 513 would force Washoe County to create general
improvement districts that could be automatically annexed at the whim of
the cities. Yes, the bill requires areas of 5,000 acres but that could
easily be revised later and the Sparks mayor already wants it reduced to
2,000 acres.
Add this to AB287 that is a direct assault on AB 160 and
we are in real danger of being outmaneuvered by those who want to create
a "Las Vegas North" and move on.
Keep track of the progress of these measures on our
AB160-Annexation page under the
HOT TOPICS menu item.
April 14, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Divide and Conquer Common
Ground
Our neighbors to the west, Incline Village, are waking
from their slumber on the issue of annexation. This
opinion piece in the North Lake Tahoe Bonanza states the realization
that they, too, could soon be targets of Reno's rabid quest for revenue.
The far-flung communities of Washoe County only consider
themselves and this works to the advantage of development forces that
can force county-wide consequences on small groups of voters.
April 14, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
AB160 Update
A resident sent in this report on the progress of AB160:
Thanks!
Monday, April 9th, the
Assembly Committee on Government Affairs voted on AB 160. The vote was
a unanimous "do pass". Now the bill will be sent to the full Assembly
for a vote. That meeting is not yet scheduled. If it passes the
Assembly, it moves to the Senate. AB160 gives property owners in rural,
unincorporated Washoe County the right to be notified, and the right to
protest a noncontiguous annexation near their property. It also changes
the makeup of the city annexation committee to a more representative
group. One that will give our county representatives a chance to be
heard, as the bill is now written, the county is outnumbered by the
cities 2:1. AB160 does not put an end to noncontiguous annexation, aka
Leapfrog annexation. But it does give the rural communities the same
rights as everyone else in Washoe County.
Our most sincere thanks to Assemblywoman Bonnie Parnell for sponsoring
AB160.
The opposing bill AB287 was a "no action" and probably will not move on
to the Senate.
April 13, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
April is Weed Time!
From the looks of our yard anyway! The "natural" areas
are starting to green up and a closer inspection shows the nasty bur
buttercup is sprouting up already. This is a tiny plant with pretty
yellow flowers but already the burs are forming that make those areas of
the yard off-limits to our dog all summer. Experts recommend raking them
out with a hoe as soon as they come up. See the
Gardening Page
for info on this and other weeds.
April 12, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
New History Feature
Myra Sauer Ratay, Washoe Valley native and author who
passed away in 1999 at age 87, wrote this
award winning essay on
the history of Washoe Valley while in high school in 1930. Access the
article directly here or through the History
Page. She relates a wealth of charming information as her
grandparents were pioneers here first arriving in 1857.
April 11, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
JohnD Winters Passes
A member of a long time Washoe Valley family passed away
recently at the age 97 as related in this
article. The Winters family was prominent in the area since their
arrival in the 1850's being involved with the Comstock Lode and ranching
in Washoe Valley and Dayton. The Winters ranch is located in the
northwest section of the valley and a large portion was recently
obtained as public open space. The gothic style ranch house is still in
private hands and can be seen along highway 395. Another informative
article is
here.
April 11, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Join Your Local Community
Advisory Board
It’s recruitment time for Washoe
County’s 16 Citizen Advisory Boards. See attached
flyer. Deadline for application submittal is May 4, 2007.
Applications will be kept on file for a period of one year.
Applications are available on-line at
www.washoecounty.us/comdev/cab_apps.htm.
Find all the info on this county
page.
April 11, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Spring Brings Door-To-Door
Scams
Our friends over at another local community website,
www.galenareno.com sent us a
"heads up" on bogus door to door sales that are ongoing in that
neighborhood. See the article here.
April 11, 2007
Comment on this article
|
Local Pottery Artist To Have Show & SaleFeaturing One of a Kind Porcelain & Stoneware
Functional, Decorative, Sculpture & Wall Pieces
April 14 & 15 at 11:00 to 5:00
2920 Lakeshore Drive, Washoe Valley
775-338-1535
manleysclayworks.com / John
Manley Pottery on CitySearch.com
|
|
East Washoe Valley CAB
Notes from the March 13, 2007
Meeting:
Deputy Jeff Masten discussed public safety and recent calls
for service. He also discussed the cost of cleaning up illegal dumping
on public land around the valley. One resident reported being charged a
$26 commercial fee for dumping at the transfer station. (See the
articles on April dump vouchers and illegal dumping above-ed). Reno
Fire Division Chief Joe DuRousseau reported that permitted burning of
yard waste is allowed at this time. He reminds everyone to change their
smoke detector batteries and to beware of bogus phone solicitations. The
next fire academy is March 19, 2007.
April 11, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
USS Washoe County Pays Visit
The Vietnam Veteran landing ship (LST 1165) made a
surprise visit on Washoe Lake today, gliding up to the east shore beach.
Though the lake is shallow the captain reported that it is quite buoyant
and the ship is designed to take a shallow draft to run up on beaches
and discharge its cargo of men and material proving the ships motto:
"You Call, We Haul, Any Beach, Any Time", to be an apt one._small.jpg)
While the great ship did not open its enormous front
doors to disgorge a squadron of tanks this time, its 15 officers and 380
enlisted men and women enjoyed a brief shore leave to the delight of the
natives.
Next stop for the ship, which won several medals and
citations in Vietnam, will be its home port in Peru as she was
decommissioned by our navy in 1973 and sold to the Peruvian Navy in
1985.
April 1, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
AB160 Needs Your Voice
Call For Letters!
Many of us want to be involved in the direction our
neighborhood is going but don't quite know how to go about it or assume
"someone" is doing something. We are here to help on both counts. Being
good citizens and respecting our freedoms means we have to take a little
time and participate in government. Electing leaders is just the
beginning. Once elected we have to continually communicate and guide
them in providing for the government we expect.
washoevalley.org is another tool to help the average
citizen do that. We provide an accessible way for you to have access to
information down to the neighborhood level in one place, a service that
no other provides. You also have an opportunity to be heard.
While we suffered a major setback with the SVAP, it just
shows how much we have dig in and participate to preserve our quality of
life here in Washoe Valley. We need a larger participation of residents
to create a balance in government and offset the overriding influence
the development machine has.
AB160 is the next "big issue" in the fight to keep Reno
style development out of our valley.
Go to the
AB160:Annexation Page to learn about the issue and participate-Send
a letter to our state legislature!
"As a resident of a rural area
I support this bill and strongly oppose AB287. There is
something unjust if a city has the ability to annex land up to my
property line affecting my life
and I do not have a vote in that city. This is a quality of life
issue that parallels taxation without representation and people
currently without a vote need to have their voices heard.
The above letter has been emailed.
I grew up back east and do not
understand why more of the outlying areas have not incorporated into
townships to have more control over local development."
March 31, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Washoe Lake Wins Photo
Contest
A photo of Washoe Lake, the west side and Carson Range
will grace the cover of "Carson Discoveries", the
Nevada Appeal's annual almanac that will
be coming out soon. The photo, by Ken Jochim,
was the winner in the Appeals photo contest.
March 31, 2007
comment on this article
|
|
Citizen Journalism Update
As traditional newspapers continue to lose readers and
fade web-based community journalism sites continue to flourish. Even big
time media sites like NBC and CNN are enlisting average citizens to send
in news. Here in Northern Nevada we have several active sites besides
washeovalley.org. Check out
www.galenareno.com, our neighbor to the north. Further north is
www.northvalleys.org.
Communities covered by both these sites have problems and concerns that
mirror ours here in Washoe Valley. Namely, the conflict between Reno and
the county over annexation, water, and preserving the rural lifestyle.
In the future we plan to cooperate to bring a larger voice to citizens
concerns over these issues and counter the influence of the development
machine. Also check out
www.aroundcarson.com to our south.
March 31, 2007
comment on this article
|
|
Urban Biologist Hired and...
Available?
Judith Saum of Environmental Health Services gave a
presentation at the March 5th WWVCAB meeting regarding
West
Nile Virus and introduced Hunter Moyles, recently hired by the USDA
to help deal with mosquitoes and animal pests in the area. One highlight
is that instead of residents having to obtain and set their own varmint
traps, Mr. Moyles will place, set and collect the traps. At the meeting
Mr. Moyles answered an array of questions about raccoons, kangaroo rats,
coyotes and the like. We will be searching for contact information.
March 26, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Nevada Eyes Washoe Valley
Water
An outfit called the Northern Nevada Development
Authority will hold a seminar on Wednesday, March 28th, that will include a
discussion on Washoe Valley's water. NNDA looks like a quasi-government
organization with a mission to attract out of state businesses and
encourage development from checking their
website. The meeting will be
on Wednesday at 7-9am in Dayton and cost $30 for non members. Details in
this
Nevada Appeal article. What do ya figure they're up to?
March 26, 2007
comment on this article
"With phrases on their website such as-
"Regional Strategy Report", "Working With and Marketing to Older Adults" and
an ad for "2007 - Regional Business and Tech Expo, I doubt if they're
looking for a place to walk their dogs."
|
|
West Washoe Valley CAB
Highlights
The March 5th WWVCAB meeting was a biggee filling 6
pages of minutes
here. The most discussed topic was the St. James Village/Joy Lake Rd
area at the north end of the valley. Certain conditions have to be met
before the 151st house can be built and the developer and residents
described to the CAB how those things have or have not happened. The
area consists of gated communities and apparently those gates are
causing some headaches. I always thought the county should have insisted
on an arterial through there from Washoe City to Mt Rose Highway but
developers have the last word, I think.
It was recommended that the proposed 3 building enclosed
RV storage facility be approved for Washoe City.
CAB members received gift baskets from the county based
upon the results of a recent county survey of county residents.
Inquiries were made about short power outages occuring
in the valley and if they have occured in East Washoe Valley.
An urban biologist has been hired by the USDA and is
available to help residents with critter problems-see the above story.
March 26, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
WV Residents Fight Annexation
This
RGJ.com article reports on the efforts of our Assemblywoman Bonnie
Parnell and a group of Washoe Valley residents who are trying to head
off the possible threat of annexation by the City of Reno. They
introduced a bill (AB160) into the state legislature that would give
residents more of a say in the proceedings. The article relates that
about 50 residents were in attendance at the introduction of the bill in
the assembly. The bill reportedly received support from the legislature.
The bill will go through committee and if it is
recommended as a "pass" then the sponsors will need to have support from
the residents in the way of letters, emails, visits and other methods to
show that the community supports and wants this legislation. We'll keep
you posted. Check out the AB160 page under "Hot Topics" for a running
log.
March 26, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
SVAP Approved...Unfortunately
From a correspondent: On Tuesday, February 20th,
the Washoe County Planning Commission voted to accept the highly flawed
South Valleys Area Plan. I can't say what happened was the Planning
Commissions fault. They depend upon Community Development staff, whose
job it is to inform the with complete and accurate facts in order for
them to make fully informed decisions. The commission members asked the
right questions, but the staff planner, a master of deceit, answered
with lies of omission, obfuscation, and word games meant to misinform.
The planning commission believed staff's misinformation and voted to
accept a plan that will introduce suburbia to rural Washoe Valley. My
thanks go out to Neal Cobb, the one commission member able to see
through the smoke screen and vote against this plan.
The SVAP, as written, will bring suburban housing and
commercial uses into Washoe Valley. It changes zoning in old Washoe City
to "Mixed Use" allowing high density condominiums, and apartments over
shops. It introduces hotel/motels with convention facilities. It
introduces utility services, water and sewer to serve all this
development. It approves inappropriate housing density for the
Weston/Lowden property which will require water/sewer even though the
owner's have no water rights.
The Department of Community Development carries the
ethical responsibility of seeing that staff perform their duties to
Commission and and Board members, if not the public, with the utmost
honesty. The sad truth is, when it serves their purpose, ethics are the
last thing on their mind: it's all about development and not at all
about community.
Our last chance is the Board of County Commissioner's
April meeting. If they fail us, I'm very sorry to say Washoe Valley will
change from a rural community to a suburb of Reno (and look like
south Reno-ed).
"When is the April meeting? I plan on
being there. We can also start writing letters to all the members on the
County Board of Commissioners. This can not happen. Our way of life will
be gone forever, and there will be no way to bring it back. All of us
can do our part. We should get those letters written now and show up at
the April meeting."
I looked at the agenda for April 10th and it wasn't
on it and the other agendas aren't on the website as yet. The next
meetings are the 3rd and 4th Tuesdays of April. The page for the agendas
is
here.-ed
March 19, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Public Asked To Share Their
Vision For Region’s Open Space
Open space and natural resources are key
quality of life factors in Washoe County. Every resident has a stake in
how these resources are impacted by growth and increasing use.
Washoe County residents are asked to share their questions, concerns and
visions for the future of open space by participating in the County’s
Regional Open Space and Natural Resource Management Plan update. A
public workshop will be held at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 3 at the
McKinley Arts and Culture Center.
Open Space Plan Public Input Workshop
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
5:30 – 8:00 p.m.
McKinley Arts and Culture Center
925 Riverside Dr., Reno
Information: Lynda Nelson (775) 823-6511
“From Pyramid Lake to the Carson City border, Washoe County is at a
stage where preserving open space is critical, both environmentally and
economically,” said Lynda Nelson, Natural Resource Planner for Washoe
County Regional Parks and Open Space. “The County’s attractive landscape
and numerous outdoor recreation activities are as closely linked to our
tourism industry as they are to our quality-of-life.”
Participants in the April 3 workshop will be asked to give input on
identified open-space and natural resource issues, provide additional
issues for discussion, and help draft the goals and visions for future
use and protection of open space.
March 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
New Menu Item!
Sometimes we cover important issues that require more
than just a short note and that need your attention on a continuing
basis. For that reason we have created the -HOT
TOPICS- section in the menu on the left margin. Here you will
find pages dedicated to that subject with updates as we get them to keep
you informed.
March 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Correction: Annexation By
Reno Article (below)
We received a corrected version of the article and I
changed the wording to reflect that in the original article below. We
are also putting together a page dedicated to this bill
here.
March 18, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Don't Eat The Fish!
"The warning was issued
after sampling by the Nevada Department of Wildlife revealed high levels
of methylmercury -- the organic form of mercury that can be particularly
toxic -- in some fish tested over the past 18 months in 39 Nevada
waterways." The
RGJ.com article continues to name White Bass as the fish to avoid in
Big and Little Washoe Lakes.
In the 1860's there were several "quartz mills"
operating in the valley processing ore from Virginia City and mercury
was a main ingredient in separating the gold and silver from the rock.
Really? There's fish in them thar ponds? After Big
Washoe dried up last year, I thought that was it for the fish, unless
they were planted. Anybody know?
March 13, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Twisted Sisters Update
The following letter was received by the East WV CAB and
is reprinted here by permission of the author:
"Dear Mr. Harrison
Chairperson, East Washoe Valley CAB,
The Twisted Sisters Stable has been granted an administrative use
permit conditional upon meeting all the remaining requirements of the
BOA and Community Development Department. We're an equine training
stable located at 3180 Clark Drive. If the East Washoe Valley CAB
receives any complaints, or requests for a change in our Stable's
methods of doing business, would it be possible for you to notify
me so I can consider how we might best resolve any difficulties our
stable may cause our neighbors? You can reach me by email
(rjankovich@sbcglobal.net), phone (322-1839), or letter (761 Marsh
Avenue, Reno 89509). We hope to be good neighbors and a
feedback loop will help us be more effective. Thank you for
considering this request.
Rebecca Jankovich"
March 13, 2007
Comments on this article
|
|
Western Nevada's "Fastest
Woman" Passes
Dorothy Mercer passed away unexpectedly last Friday in
Carson City. While not a Washoe Valley resident, I thought I should
mention her
untimely passing as many residents know her and she was a life-long
resident of North Lake Tahoe, western Nevada and Pleasant Valley.
Dorothy went to the one room school house in Kings Beach and in her
early years gained fame and trophies in local snowmobile racing. She was
recruited by Polaris to be the only woman on a factory team competing
across the US. She competed equally with the men and won or placed
highly many times n the nations biggest events. The fearless Ms. Mercer
held the world snowmobile speed record of 138 mph for women for 20 years
and was inducted into the Snowmobile Hall of Fame in 1993. In her later
years she dedicated her life to family and helping others. She will be
missed by all that knew her. Go to this
pdf file
for clippings and photos.
March 13, 2006
Comment on this article
|
|
Annexation by Reno?
Current annexation policies, it is your editors
understanding, allow the city of Reno to annex unincorporated areas of
Washoe County at the request of any property owner. We received the
following correspondence on a group of citizens effort to protect our
valley from this:
Updated March 18, 2007:
On February 23, 2007 Assemblywoman Bonnie Parnell
introduced a bill, AB160, to revise the law on annexation by request in
the unincorporated areas of some counties. This bill was initiated by a
group of east Washoe Valley residents. In a nutshell,
it revises the membership of city annexation commissions, and will no
longer allow the city annexation commission's duties to be transferred
to the regional planning commission. It also gives property owners in
the unincorporated areas the right to be notified and to protest a
proposed annexation.
Bonnie Parnell met with John Hestor of the City of Reno,
who suggested this bill goes against the Settlement Agreement. As a
result of that meeting, the bill has been sent to Judge Hardesty for his
opinion.
Ab160 is a bill by citizens of unincorporated Washoe
County who were not involved in the Settlement Agreement, and who's
representative government is prevented by the Settlement Agreement, from
representing those citizens on annexation issues. This bill will give
all property owners in unincorporated Washoe County the right to be
heard on noncontiguous annexation near their properties. We will be
given the right of notice and the right to protest annexation, something
none of us now have.
AB160 will positively effect conservation issues by
giving the people a right to protest inappropriate land uses, and demand
protection and conservative use of our natural resources. Landowners
concerned about and most familiar with open space, wildlife, water and
air quality, and recreation in Washoe Valley, will have a say in what
happens in their own neighborhood.
Information on what you can do to support AB160 will be
posted on washoevalley.org.
See our special AB160 Update Page
here.
March 13, 2007
Comment on this
article
|
|
Nuisance Committee Update
Cindra Smith, our East WV representative on the
committee reports that the agenda for the March 15th meeting is
here, the representative map is
here, committee roster is
here, and a whole lot of other stuff is
here on the
county's website for updating the nuisance ordinance. A citizens
enlightening review of the proposed ordinance is
here. The
minutes for the March 1st meeting are
here.
March 12, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
A Resident Writes
I love your website. Obviously, I have been out of
touch with issues concerning the valley. The development at the
corner of 395, East Lake Boulevard and Skinner is ridiculous. The
left hand turn lane onto East Lake is horrible at 5:30 PM. You are
taking your life in your hands if you are the last in line near the
freeway.
I live off of Skinner. I have lived here for 24
years. I love Washoe Valley. In the past year, we have had the
pleasure of watching a Great Horned Owl, a Golden Eagle and a Goss
Hawk on our property. I loved when my children were little and they
could ride bicycles or sled without worrying about traffic.
I know my neighbors on my street and know if a
problem arises, they will be there to help and that we would do the
same.
We all moved to Washoe Valley for a reason. It's a
beautiful place, close enough to cities but without congestion or
the crime problems in our neighboring communities.
I hope it never changes."I
agree with the writer. I am in that holding left turn lane on 395
and Eastlake
at 5:30 pm Monday through Friday. That lane fills up and the rest
of the left turn lane traffic dangerously sits on 395 looking in
their rear view mirrors with their foot on the brake hoping traffic
stops behind them. The thought of more housing and the possibility
of 2-cars per house adding to this congestion scares me. What are
the planners and decision makers thinking! I was very disturbed at
the report on the recent meeting at
Pleasant Valley
School
where residents could voice their opinion about the development on
both sides of 395/Eastlake/Pagni Lane. They listened but did as
they intended to do prior to the meeting. No one takes into
consideration what residents are saying. They only listen to
developers and the sound of more cash in the form of more property
tax for the county. I feel as if the situation is hopeless."
March 13, 2007
Comment on this
article
|
|
East Washoe Valley CAB
Notes and high points from the minutes
of the February 13th meeting of the CAB
Everyone was encouraged to track BDR-48-183 which is
pertaining with establishing a Northern Nevada Water Authority
(ironic that the more rare a thing is, the bigger it gets-ed).
The CABs have entered the digital age and the recordings
will be available on CD (Maybe CD's aren't dead after all-ed)
Deputy Jeff Masten of the Sheriff's office reminded us
there are currently no laws against ice skating.
Washoe County Schools gave a presententation on school
construction needs. A question was raised about providing funding
through a state lottery. (As an ex Californian (hey, my dad was born
in Goldfield, though) I learned that a legislature will let the lottery
fund schools and spend the usual education money on something else
leaving no net gain-ed)
A representative of the county health department said
that because of increasing human victims of West Nile Virus, residents
are encouraged to use mosquito repellant.
Horses For the Spirit, a local equine/human therapy
organization, gave a presentation. (Their website is available on our
links page-ed). They are looking for a home, preferably on Lakeshore
Dr.
An update was given on the Area Plan and the matter is
in the hands of the Planning Commission.
The next meeting of the East WV CAB will be tomorrow
night, March 13th at 7pm at the NDF building on Eastlake Blvd.
March 12, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
West Washoe Valley CAB
Minutes of the February WWVCAB meeting are available
here. Highlights include comments on the Feb. 3rd Joint CAB meeting,
Sierra Fire Protection District, Capital spending for schools, US395
traffic issues and the proposed RV storage facility in Washoe City.
The
agenda for the March 5th CAB meeting is here.
February 25, 2007
Comment on this article
|
|
Joint SVAP Meeting Minutes
The minutes of the February 3rd joint meeting of the
Steamboat/Pleasant Valley and Washoe Valley CABs with the county
planning dept. concerning the South Valleys Area Plan Draft is on this
page. See my
review of the meeting
here.
February 25, 2007
Comment on this article
"On February 20th the Washoe County
Planning Commission met to consider among other things the South Valleys
Area Plan (SVAP) including a controversial section allowing for a
development of up to140 homes known as the Weston/ Lowden properties at
the north end of Washoe Valley. At that meeting the commissioners heard
public comment on the SVAP.
Two people came forward in favor of the inclusion of the WL properties
specific plan into the SVAP (both with vested interest) and six other
people favored (all but one with commercial interests in the Galena
Steamboat/Pleasant Valley area). 17 people came forward to speak against
the inclusion of the WL specific plan. The chairmen of the Citizens
Advisory Boards for Washoe Valley spoke on behalf of their respective
districts against the inclusion of the WL properties and an opinion poll
with in excess of 900 signatures was offered.
The Washoe C | |